Determining the order of actions in an
abstract combat system seems to be the topic du jour. Here's yet
another idea to throw on the pile.
In most situations, use the To-Hit
Roll to determine the order of action resolution. In melee, d20
rolls are being generated by each attacking character every round.
Why not have them perform this double-duty and save the need for an additional roll. The
need to establish “who-goes-first” might not be necessary until
action is actually being taken in this case. As a T&T fan, my preference is to keep my combat abstract and quick, and I am used to determining how things are resolved after rolls have been made for the round. It could be easier to obtain the order of events when all the actions are out there (only instead of ordering things by declaration and having to deal with the "I changed my mind" or "But the guy I wanted to hit is dead" issues, this relies on a random factor).
This still might work better with
Declaration-based, Phasic Combat situations. Since Spell Use does not
necessarily result in a d20 roll, maybe Spells could be
automatically assigned a number based on level/complexity, maybe they are just a modifiable (see below) "1" or "10" or just resolved last, to offer an opportunity for interruption (something I've always liked but found difficult to implement consistently). My gut
feeling is that Ranged weapons don't necessarily need to have
iterative resolution, but in any case you might want to refrain from
resolving damage until the end of the round when using a system like this (another technique for embracing the abstract).
Here are some options/elaborations:
Use the Unmodified d20 roll to Determine Order of Resolution
You could go lowest to highest one round, and
then highest to lowest the next to keep things random. Or if the
first d20 roll is even, resolves High to Low. If it's odd, Low to High resolution.
For side-based initiative, have Evens/Odds serve as a stand-in to
determine if the Players or Monsters resolve first. There won't be ties
this way.
Use the Final Modified Attack Roll
This will lead to higher level/HD
individuals having their actions resolved first consistently, and could effectively
makes any Strength Ability Score bonus a bonus to initiative as well, but
this option could reflect experience, expertise and potentially even size (for
large HD creatures) getting the first swing in more often. This seems pretty deadly (the Dragon's attacks are resolved first each round, meaning the parties actions are primarily reactive), maybe useful for a gritty/grim style of gaming.
Modify the roll by Something Else
Modify it by Dexterity bonus or apply
an Intelligence or Wisdom modifier (this might be sub-optimal for
monsters, as their statistic blocks usually don't incorporate ability
scores). Apply a bonus for longer/faster weapons versus
shorter/slower weapons. Give certain Classes/Monster Types a bonus
(one-time or level/HD based). Modify the roll for heavy encumbrance. armor type worn, or Movement Rate. Using modifiers like these might keep the order a
little more randomized, and the best hitters will not necessarily be
as likely to go first. I kind of like the idea of giving a bonus to Unarmored Swashbucker/Thief Types. Have a place for an individual's total Initiative Modifier on the Character Sheet.
Have the roll take place on a die
drop sheet to track order-of-actions
I imagine a bulls-eye or race-course
type situation, with rolls closer to the center/finish line going
first. Probably pretty complicated without a constrained rolling surface (players love to throw those d20s).
Thoughts or glaring omissions/issues? Want me to work up some Examples? Again, these options heavily embrace the abstract nature of combat and wait for intention to become action before determining an order of resolution. The results will probably be pretty chaotic. I'll have to run this with my group a few different ways to kick the tires.
I am playing without initiative. It works in small groups <=4, when there is a battlemap. I would not do it with >5 players. I am not sure it would work without the battlemap. Basically, the DM decides what the NPCs and monsters will do, and asks what each player will do. Then, everything is resolved simultaneously. Some characters/monsters will hit and die in the same round. It is messy and fun, as a combat should be. To make it a bit more realistic, if characters are moving to engage combat, attacks of missile weapons at them is resolved first, since they might die as they move. Spells are also resolved last in the round, since casting concentration could be broken, and it should be something that requires more time to finalise.
ReplyDeleteYeah, since this post I've definitely tried on several more systems for size. Rarely use miniatures/battlemaps, preferring the Theater of the Mind, but it sounds like your system is pretty similar to the phases in the RC. Morale/Movement/Missile/Magic/Melee, etc. I still enjoy adding a "Declaration" step just so everyone's on the same page with their intentions.
DeleteAnother I experimented with was more of a "Count Up" system and assigning actions a dice: Movement was d6, Melee was the damage dice, Magic was a d8+Spell Level. Everyone rolls their dice based on what they want to do and we count up from one and resolve.